Legal Opinion

United States v. Claude S. Gossett Et Ux., United States of America v. Charles D. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 1969No. 23162, 23163PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Before us for review is the action of the District Court in granting summary judgments to plaintiff. Discovery procedures, including affidavits and interrogatories, were extensively employed. We affirm.

Involved is the title and right to possession of lands located in California, west of the present flow of the Colorado River. The runaway waters of this once unpredictable and highly destructive river have left in their wake a substantial body of law. For example, Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 83 S.Ct. 1468, 10 L.Ed.2d 542 (1963); United States v. Arizona, 295…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States Jaycees v. San Francisco Jr. Cham. of Com.District Court, N.D. California · 1972
  3. Eichler O. Kelly v. H. E. Springett, Bureau of Narcotics EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hollinger v. Wagner Mining Equipment Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API