Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1956No. 33361PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
The basic question in this case is whether certain eminent domain proceedings (initiated by the state highway department to acquire property for highway purposes) are valid.
The background of the matter and the questions involved are as follows: The state highway department sought and obtained an order of public use and necessity respecting certain property. Neither the department nor the property owner sought a review of the order within the period as allowed by statute.
Subsequently, just prior to the trial which was for the purpose of ascertaining the amount of damages to be awarded to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Thompson v. JanesTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- State ex rel. Peel v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Polson Logging Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Town of Othello v. HarderWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- State ex rel. Struntz v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Fite v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- STATE EX REL. CONVENTION CENTER v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Snyder v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.