Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1901No. Sac. No. 587PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Prewett, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke,j.

—The action is in the nature of ejectment, brought to recover a portion of the south half of the northwest quarter of section 25, township 13 north, range 6 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian, the land being situate in Placer County. The plaintiff deraigns title to the land in question under a deed dated July 26, 1887, from the Central Pacific Railroad Company, which company, it was admitted, became the owner of the lands in the year 1862 by a grant under the act of Congress of that year. By way of cross-complaint the defendant set up a prior right to purchase from the railroad company the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stringer v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Boyd v. BrinckinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Southern Pacific Railroad v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stonaker v. Big Sisters HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Mazzera v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Chamberlain v. ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Harvey v. City of HoltvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Hopkins v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API