Pool v. Butler
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.—
This appeal is from an order dismissing the action, made upon plaintiffs’ motion. The action was to condemn a strip of land 60 x 145 feet, for a ferry-landing on the Sacramento River, in Yolo County. There was a prior appeal from the judgment condemning the land for said purpose in which the judgment was affirmed (reported in 134 Cal. 621, entitled Pool v. Simmons). In that case the trial court gave judgment to the plaintiff, condemning the land to the burden of an easement for the proposed ferry-landing, and assessing the damages at $285. The defendants upon the trial reserved…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Co. v. TetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Steinhart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Graff v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Los Angeles, Pasadena, & Glendale Railway Co. v. RumppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- In Re Estate of EdelmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Davis v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- McLemore v. Express Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Struntz v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. HelmArizona Supreme Court · 1959
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.