Legal Opinion

In Re Memorial Hall Site

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1946No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 43,411PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant, Laura H. Cristy, owner of parcel No. 25 appeals from an award made in condemnation proceedings in the recorder's court of the city of Detroit to appropriate property as a site for the Memorial Hall.

The property owned by defendant has been used as a parking lot in conjunction with other parcels of land. The assessed valuation of this parcel prior to 1935 was $13,600, from 1936 to 1938 it was $11,370, and from 1940 through 1945 it was $6,830. During the trial, defendant offered in evidence the assessment rolls of the city of Detroit for the year 1945 for the purpose of showing that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kansas City & Grandview Railway Co. v. HaakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. City of New Orleans v. LarrouxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Commonwealth by State Highway Com. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Duggan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Joyce v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Hayes EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in the County of Arlington, State of Virginia, and Howard W. SilsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Bergen County Sewer Authority v. Borough of Little FerryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Detroit/Wayne County Stadium Authority v. Drinkwater, Taylor & Merrill, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Jack Loeks Theatres, Inc v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API