Legal Opinion

Russell v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1949No. 33546PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff in error, William Russell, Jr., instituted this action against defendants in error, R. L. Freeman, and others, to quiet title to real estate and incidental relief. In his petition plaintiff deraigns title to the premises by patent from the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations bearing date of November 23, 1905. It is alleged in the petition that plaintiff is and has been in possession of the premises since the date of patent; that defendants claim right, title and interest therein, adverse to plaintiff, the exact nature of which is unknown but that same is subordinate to plaintiff’s title…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moschos v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Wilson v. BombeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ashur v. McCreerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Green v. CorrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Mooney v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. I.C. Gas Amcana, Inc. v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API