Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Bombeck

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1913No. 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by Henry Bombeck against Elias M. Wilson and others. From, the judgment, Wilson brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by Henry Bombeck, the cross-petitioner and one of the defendants in’ ■error herein, against the plaintiff in error, Elias M. Wilson, and Hiram B. Spencer, Jesse Landis, and W. H. Gehring, defendants in error, for the purpose of determining his right and title and interest in and to a certain tract of real estate situated in Blaine county. There seems to have been two trials in the court below; a new trial having been granted upon the ground that the losing party was entitled thereto as a matter of right, under section 4792, Wilson’s Bev. & Ann. Stat. 1903 (Bev.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall's Heirs v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Stout v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Courtney v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Duffey v. RaffertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Simpson v. BoringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Maynard v. HusteadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Hudson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API