Legal Opinion

Green v. Correll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 31, 1928No. 18554PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1-IEENER, J.

Joe Correll and Zadie Cor-rell, as plaintiffs, commenced tliis action in the district court of Pontotoc county against C. F. Green and E. L. Spencer, tlie plaintiffs in error herein, as defendants. After the trial in the lower court the plaintiff Joe Correll died intestate, no administrator was appointed, and the cause was revived in the name of his heirs at law, Mary Correll, his mother, and Zadie Correll, his wife, the defendants in error herein. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared below.

The purpose of the suit was to quiet title in the plaintiffs to their homestead…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gillett v. RomigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Tidal Refining Co. v. Charles E. Knox Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Adams v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Newbern v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Russell v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Harjo v. ChilcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Comstock v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API