Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
'DAVISON, Justice.
This case comes here by appeal from a judgment rendered by the trial court without the intervention of ’á jury. ' The sole question for determination here is whether or not the court was in error in denying plaintiffs the right to 'a jury trial. The suit was instituted by Mary Kathryn Castle Steinway, her mother, Kathleen L. Dieffen-bach, and her maternal grandmother, Julia LeBus,- as minority stockholders in the corporation,- Majestic Amusement Company, as plaintiffs, against the defendants, Griffith Metropolitan Theatres, Inc., .Henry S. Griffing, Lois McColgin and C, R.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Isaac v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Rettinger ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. PierpontNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Warren v. Century Bankcorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Dowdy v. ClausewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.