Legal Opinion
Simko v. Ervin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1995No. 15200PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, in order to challenge the conformity of a building with the terms of a variance, the plaintiffs were required to exhaust their administrative remedies before seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in the trial court. The plaintiffs, Jeannette Simko and Valerie Varga, brought this action in the trial court, claiming that the defendant, Roy Henry Ervin, trustee, had failed to comply with a certain condition of a variance that had been granted by the zoning board of appeals of the town of Fairfield (board) for construction of a building on his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Fish Unlimited v. Northeast Utilities Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Johnson v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.