Legal Opinion

Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of Sterling

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1987No. 13123PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the plaintiffs, the Concerned Citizens of Sterling et al., were required to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing their action for injunctive relief in the Superior Court. The named plaintiff is a nonprofit citizens’ organization composed of citizens, taxpayers and residents of the town of Ster*552ling.1 The defendant, the town of Sterling, is a Connecticut municipality that owns an industrial park, known as the Town of Sterling Industrial Park.2

The background facts are not in dispute. In late January, 1986, town officials announced…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API