Concerned Citizens of Sterling v. Town of Sterling
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the plaintiffs, the Concerned Citizens of Sterling et al., were required to exhaust their administrative remedies before filing their action for injunctive relief in the Superior Court. The named plaintiff is a nonprofit citizens’ organization composed of citizens, taxpayers and residents of the town of Ster*552ling.1 The defendant, the town of Sterling, is a Connecticut municipality that owns an industrial park, known as the Town of Sterling Industrial Park.2
The background facts are not in dispute. In late January, 1986, town officials announced…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cannata v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.