Legal Opinion

Pet v. Department of Health Services

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 10, 1988No. 13163PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting interlocutory injunctive relief to the plaintiff physician in an administrative action brought by the defendant department of health services (department) before the defendant Connecticut medical examining board (board).1 The department alleged that the plaintiff, Donald Pet, a psychiatrist, had violated General Statutes § 20-13c2 by, inter alia, not providing proper psychiatric care and treatment to certain patients. We find error and remand the case to the trial court because the plaintiff failed to exhaust his…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Vincenzo v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API