Legal Opinion
Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1988No. 13193PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The present action comes before this court sitting en banc on a grant of the plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Practice Book § 4122. Initially, the plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Court, pursuant to the grant of a petition for certification,1 wherein they sought review of a judgment dismissing their administrative appeal from a decision of the zoning board of appeals of the town of Fairfield (board). The appeal was then transferred to this court, pursuant to Practice Book § 4023, and argued on October 6, 1987. Our decision in Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 205…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.