Legal Opinion

Richard H. Bridgman v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 17, 1968No. 378-66PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

This is the unusual case in which the court must decide whether a serviceman can benefit from a Correction Board determination which is favorable to him. It is common ground that he is entitled to recover if we accept the Board’s decision. The only question is whether that holding is sustainable.

The case concerns the amount of retired pay to which plaintiff was entitled for the span from October 9, 1946, to September 30, 1949. Because of the mutual agreements and concessions on these cross-motions for summary judgment, we can pare our statement of the relevant aspects Of his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Leslie D. Jamerson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Dunstan Abel v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. John H. Vandermolen v. John C. Stetson, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API