Legal Opinion

Estep v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 4, 1946No. Nos. 292 and 66PublishedCited by 912 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me: Justice Douglas

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Falbo v. United States, 320 U. S. 549, we held that in a criminal prosecution under § 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 (54 Stat. 894, 50 U. S. C. App. § 311) a registrant could not defend on the ground that he was wrongfully classified and was entitled to a statutory exemption, where the offense was a failure to report for induction into the armed forces or for work of national importance.1 We found no provision for judicial *116review of a registrant’s classification prior to the time when he had taken all the steps in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by912 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

907 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API