Legal Opinion

Carroll v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 6, 1948No. 47690PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

This is an action by a major, United States Army retired, to recover the difference between the retired pay of a major with over twenty-four years’ service, which he contends he is entitled to receive, and the retired pay of a major with over nine years’ service, which he actually has received, in respect of the period March 25, 1945, to the date judgment may be entered herein.

In accordance with the stipulation of facts filed herein by the parties, the plaintiff was appointed second lieutenant, United States Army, on November 1, 1918, and first lieutenant, United States Army, on April 10,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884
  2. Byrd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  3. Fulmer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897
  4. Bowie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1909
  5. Thornley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Danielson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Aflague v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Richard L. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Oleson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API