Leslie D. Jamerson v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Judge.
This is a suit for the difference in the pay plaintiff receives as a retired Air Force Reserve Major and the pay he would receive as a retired Air Force Reserve Lieutenant Colonel with the same length of service. There are no genuine issues of material fact and the case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment.
Plaintiff, a Reserve officer in the Air Force since 1929, was serving on extended active duty when he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on July 1, 1960. By permission of the Secretary of the Air Force, he remained on active duty after that date as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Field v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Richard H. Bridgman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Charles H. Grahl v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Reeves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Burns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Bates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Murphy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.