Morgan v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAPIER, Judge:
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. After consideration of the motion papers and oral *608argument, the Court denies plaintiffs motion and grants defendant’s motion.1
Facts
Plaintiff first entered the Armed Services as an enlisted man in the United States Army on September 8, 1942. He served as an enlisted man until July 15, 1943, at which time he was commissioned and served on active duty as a reserve officer until July 8,1949. On July 9,1949, he was commissioned in the Regular Army and served as a commissioned officer in the Regular Army…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Ralston Steel Corporation, Assignee of Morgan Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994