Legal Opinion

Wiley Electric, Inc. v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1988No. 65458PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The present controversy arises from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the appellee, Willa Brantley. Certiorari is granted to answer a question of first impression: whether 12 O.S. 1981 § 100 1 requires that a second action, rather than a petition in the original case, be filed to avail a party of the savings clause providing that a new action may be filed within one year of dismissal otherwise than on the merits of any timely-filed action. The appellant, Wiley Electric, Inc., presents a second issue for determination by this Court: whether filing an amended…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cooper v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Parker v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Ross v. Kelsey Hayes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Valley Vista Development Corp. v. City of Broken ArrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API