Legal Opinion

Valley Vista Development Corp. v. City of Broken Arrow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1988No. 69292PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The four questions presented are: (1) Whether after a void judgment has been rendered, the trial court may take judicial notice of findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in such judgment in a subsequent proceeding; (2) Whether the savings clause of 12 O.S.1981 § 100 1 operates to extend the time period for filing a new action where the original action resulted in a void judgment under 62 O.S.1981 § 363; 2 (3) Whether the record contains sufficient evidence of the financial status of the municipality under 62 O.S.1981 § 362 3 to support a money judgment; and (4)…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. C & C Tile Co. v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 7 of Tulsa Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Niemeyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Cruse v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Ross v. Kelsey Hayes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Washington v. State ex rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API