Legal Opinion

Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1995No. 79337PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Three issues are dispositive of appellant’s certiorari quest for corrective relief: (1) Did the trial court’s jurisdiction end at either the satisfaction-of-judgment stage or at the point plaintiff dismissed the action? (2) Did the trial court in the exercise of its vacation power have ancillary cognizance to entertain defendant’s restitutionary counterclaim? and (3) Should this appeal be dismissed as untimely?

We answer the first question in the negative and the second and third in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Edmond Stites [Stites] brought an action to recover…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API