Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Goldstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1954No. Civ. 4691PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This appeal is from parts of an order entitled “Order Approving Report and Account of Receiver and Amendment and Supplement thereto, Ordering Defendant to Deliver Property and Pay Money to Receiver, and Instructing Receiver.’’ This order was signed by Judge DeWolf on June 29, 1953, and modified a previous order signed by him in the same action on June 30, 1950.

It is contended by appellant (1) That the order of June 29, 1953, should be reversed for the reason that it was arbitrarily invalid and violative of the order of June 30, 1950; and (2) That the order of June 29, 1953, should be reversed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re Guardianship of the Person & Estate of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Lesser & Son v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Interlake Co. v. Von HakeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. County of San Mateo v. BartoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API