Legal Opinion

McClenny v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1964No. L.A. 27584PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This is another in the protracted series of cases requiring interpretation of section 170.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The sole issue turns upon whether a notice of motion to disqualify a trial judge is timely when filed prior to a proceeding on an indirect contempt which is supplementary to a domestic relations action. For the reasons which we set forth below, we have concluded that such notice of motion is not timely.

Dora S. McGlenny, now deceased, 1 initiated a divorce action against defendant James E. McGlenny on October 5, 1961. Judge John F. McCarthy presided at all of the numerous…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Schlyen v. SchlyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Swartzman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Reproductive Health Services, Inc. v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Ball v. City Council of CoachellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API