Legal Opinion

Williams v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1939No. L. A. 17263PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

An order was made by the judge of department 34 of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County citing Samuel Rappaport, one of the official stenographic reporters of the superior court of that county, to appear before said department on March 6, 1939, then and there to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt for failing to comply with a previous order made by the judge of said department on January 4, 1939, directing said reporter to proceed immediately with the preparation of a reporter’s transcript in accordance with the written agreement theretofore…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Griess v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People v. Wong BinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. RivaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API