Legal Opinion
Warner v. O'CONNOR
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1962No. Civ. 25449PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in an action for malicious prosecution.
In March of 1958 plaintiffs Malcolm S. Warner and Mary V. Warner, his wife, owned a jewelry business operated under the name of M. Sterling Corporation in Los Angeles, California. Mr. and Mrs. Warner were in financial difficulties. Upon hearing of their circumstances, a friend, Mrs. Mildred Cabany, stated she was willing to lend the Warners some money. In addition she arranged a meeting for them with defendant W. J. 0 ’Connor who was also interested in lending money. The parties met at the Warners’ home on March…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Richter v. NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Reimer v. FirpoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Northrup v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tierney v. Javaid, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Tierney v. JavaidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018