Legal Opinion

Kam Chin Chun Ming v. Kam Hee Ho

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1962No. 4094PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

LEWIS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which, after trial, dismissed a petition in an action seeking to set aside a family settlement and the order of the probate court based thereon.

Ho Poi, hereinafter referred to as decedent, in 1890 at the age of 27 went from Hawaii to the village in China from which he had emigrated, returning to Hawaii in 1891 with a wife, Chang Shee. Under the pleadings it is undisputed that Chang ghee was the mother, and Ho Poi the father, of the six petitioners-appellants and the respondent-appellee Earn Hee Ho. In the court below these…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Langley v. Irons Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. De Caro v. De CaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Hoffman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hawai'i Housing Authority v. UyeharaHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Pacheco v. HILO ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, LTD.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API