Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Cole

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1946No. L. A. 19575PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an action in eminent domain (Code Civ. Proe., § 1237) instituted by the plaintiff city to acquire twelve parcels of land in the Los Angeles Civic Center area for a new alignment of certain streets therein. For the determination of the market value of parcels 5, 9 and 11, a “first trial” was had before a jury and a verdict was returned. Thereafter, and before any other issue was tried and before findings were signed or judgment was entered, plaintiff filed a so-called “notice of intention to move for a new trial. ’ ’ An order was made granting said motion “particularly upon the ground…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API