Bordin v. Bordin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
At the conclusion of the trial of this action findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived by both parties, whereupon an interlocutory decree of divorce was awarded to each of the parties. Defendant has appealed from the interlocutory judgment. The case comes to us solely upon the clerk’s record.
Although appellant appeals from the judgment and “the whole thereof, ’ ’ appellant accepts those parts of the judgment (1) awarding both parties a divorce, (2) awarding custody of the minor children, (3) providing for support, (4) awarding alimony to appellant, and (5)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Haseltine v. HaseltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hicks v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Wong v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.