Legal Opinion

Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1948No. L. A. 20312PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*161SCHAUER, J.

Plaintiff Harris Stiekel sued to recover damages for the death of his wife and for his own personal injuries resulting from a collision between a bus of defendant railway company driven by defendant Amos, its employe, and a pickup truck in which plaintiff was a passenger and which was being driven by Mrs. Stiekel. Defendants appeal from a judgment pursuant to a jury verdict for plaintiff and from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We have concluded that their many claims of error do not justify a reversal.

The accident occurred at about 10:40 p.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API