Wenzel v. Kieruj
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Paul Wenzel against Eelix F. Kieruj for work done for defendant. On appeal -to the circuit court the cause was tried by a jury. Judgment for defendant.' Plaintiff brings• error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $135 for alleged extra work for coveringlthe steam pipes under St. Francis Church, in the city of Detroit. The plaintiff has for many years been engaged in the business of plumbing and steam fitting. In 1904, the congregation of said church determined to erect a church and school, and Kastler & Hunter, architects, were selected to prepare plans and specifications, and to ask for and receive bids for the work. Among the bids received was the one from the plaintiff for steam fitting, which was accepted, and a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Douglass v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- M. Rumely & Co. v. EmmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Tompkins v. Gardner & Spry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Cook v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. FrisbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Quisle v. BreznerMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Brown v. Forrester Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.