Douglass v. Paine
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton; Streeter, J. Case by Nellie B. Douglass against William A. Paine and Charles H. Paine, copartners as Paine, Webber & Company, for the unlawful sale and conversion of certain shares of stock. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff is a married woman, residing at Houghton, in this State. Defendants are stockbrokers, residing and doing business at Boston, Mass. They also maintain a branch office at Houghton, Mich., in charge of one Mr. Dee, a salaried employé of the defendants ; the sign over the door of his office being ‘ ‘ Paine, Webber & Co. Thomas S. Dee, Manager.” The plaintiff occupied rooms in the same building at the time of the transaction which gave rise to this action. The action was brought to recover damages for the alleged unlawful sale and conversion of some Copper Range stock which…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Dudley A. Tyng & Co. v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Millar v. HiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Wenzel v. KierujMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Barras v. YoungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.