M. Rumely & Co. v. Emmons
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Cass. (O’Hara, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of assumpsit on a promissory note. On the trial in the court below, before a jury, the plaintiff had verdict and judgment for the amount of the note and interest. Defendants bring error.
On the trial it appeared that the plaintiff is a corporation, doing business at La Porte, Ind., and is the assignee of the contract or note upon which the suit is brought. The note was given as a part of the purchase price of a portable engine and circular saw-mill, with equipments. The purchase of the mill was made on March 8, 1887, at the price of $1,120.
*513Prior to December 4, 1882, tbe…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. CrandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- John Hutchison Manufacturing Co. v. PinchMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Tuttle v. Briscoe Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Wenzel v. KierujMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. FrisbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.