Legal Opinion

Brown v. Forrester Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1963No. Calendar 94, 95, Docket 48,004, 48,005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff heating company entered into a subcontract with defendant, April 28, 1952, to furnish plumbing and heating according to specifications in a contract 761, between defendant and the department of army. The heating company also entered into another subcontract with defendant, July 2,1952, for excavating and trenching according to specifications in a contract 884 between defendant and the army. Plaintiff heating company instituted suit in assumpsit for $29,407.40. It claimed, among other things, that during the course of work, defendant “requested and ordered plaintiffs to do certain…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Torrent v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gilmer v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Holmes v. BorowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Wenzel v. KierujMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Millar v. MacEy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. DrakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Turner Associates, Inc. v. Small Parts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  4. Brown v. Forrester Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. RowanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API