Legal Opinion
Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1947No. Docket No. 42, Calendar No. 43,350PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Plaintiff E. P. Brady bases his right to recovery in the instant suit on the claim that on the 3d of July, 1943, he entered into a parol agree mént with defendant Central Excavators, Inc., parts of which agreement were subsequently reduced to writing evidenced By letters dated July 3 .and July 16, 1943, and a purchase order of the latter date. -The letters and purchase order are as follows:
Exhibit A.
‘ ‘ Central Excavators Ypsilanti, Michigan.
Gentlemen:
“The following is confirmation on our verbal conversations street work on the Hunldn-Conkey job.
“We have an Austin Western #99 patrol grader…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cohn v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- The Ohio Crane Co. v. HicksOhio Supreme Court · 1924
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Nag Enterprises, Inc v. All State Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Scholz v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Dairyland Insurance v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.