Legal Opinion

Cook v. First National Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Menominee. (Stone, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

On August 5, 1890, tbe plaintiffs entered jnto a written contract with Peters & Morrison, a copartnership, to sell them a quantity of pine saw-logs. The contract of sale, or bill of' sale, as it is designated in tbe record, plainly expresses upon its face an agreement to convey tbe title to all tbe logs described to said Peters & Morrison. At tbe time of the purchase a part of the logs were in tbe Pesbtigo river, Marinette county, Wis., and tbe remainder near the mouth of tbe Menominee river, in the boom of tbe Marinette Saw-Mill Company, and all together were estimated at 1,330,138 feet,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vance v. HeathUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wenzel v. KierujMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Haag v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Malone v. KugelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API