Western Assurance Co. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiffs, five in number, are duly organized corporations, and, during all the times mentioned in the complaint, engaged in the fire insurance business in the state of California, by authority of and obediently to the laws thereof. Each of these insurance companies—some in the year 1919 and the others in the year 1920—issued a policy of insurance in a certain specified sum on the dwelling-house, a tankhouse and windmill, a blacksmith-shop, a garage, a large barn and two small barns, all located upon the east side of Sutter basin by-pass levee, on what was formerly known as the Ball…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gibbons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.