Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J. —
Powers Farms, Inc., the owner of improved land planted principally to mature orchards and vineyards, recovered a judgment for damages which the trial court found that it sustained when Consolidated Irrigation District permitted water to seep from its canals. One of the special defenses to the action is that no verified claim of damages was filed as required by the Irrigation District Liability Law (Stats. 1935, p. 2250; Deering’s Gen. Laws, vol. 1, p. 1932, act 38861, see. 2). The principal question for decision upon the appeal of the district from the judgment is whether this…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ray v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.