Legal Opinion

Myhre v. Hessey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1943PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action was brought to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The complaint contains two causes of action, the first for prosecution of a criminal action, and the second for the prosecution of a series of civil actions. The jury, by general verdict, found for the plaintiff on both causes of action. They did not assess the damages on each cause separately but assessed the damages for both at $1,000. The trial judge on motions after verdict held that the evidence supported the finding of the jury upon the first cause of action, although he expressed doubt about it; that it did not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kolka v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Shedd v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Luby v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Volland v. McGeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Huebner v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Bickel v. MacKieDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1978
  3. O'TOOLE v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Estate of EannelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Soffos v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API