Legal Opinion

Estate of Eannelli

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1955PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

Our first consideration in the matter of these appeals is appellant’s challenge of the trial court’s findings of fact. It is well established in this jurisdiction that findings of a trial court are not to be disturbed on appeal unless they are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Swazee v. Lee (1951), 259 Wis. 136, 137, 47 N. W. (2d) 733.

Upon the trial, the respondents (petitioners below) presented evidence to the effect that Anthony Eannelli had survived the others. .The appellant (respondents below) offered evidence that Anna Eannelli was still living after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swazee v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Myhre v. HesseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Jacobson v. BryanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Coel v. Green Bay Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Sowle v. BrittichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. HerfelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bear v. Kenosha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dumer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API