Legal Opinion

Huebner v. Fischer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

On the plaintiff’s appeal from the order granting a new trial in the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that the court erred in ordering a new trial. It clearly appears that the court ordered a new trial for the reason that the testimony in the adverse examination relating to the defendant’s drinking intoxicating liquor was not specifically called to its attention or offered in evidence. The defendant did not offer the questions and answers in evidence, nor did the plaintiff in any manner refer to them. Upon the trial the defendant was asked no questions relating to his drinking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mahnke v. KablitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Crombie v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Johnson v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Besser v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Burns v. WeykerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hillstead v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Myhre v. HesseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Newton v. Wetherby's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Quick v. American Legion 1960 Convention Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Van Gheem v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API