Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Wolfberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 3, 1995No. 81416PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit [certifying court] certified the following questions pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1991 §§ 1601 et seq.:
1. In light of the facts as detailed below that the Defendants Laurance B. Wolfberg and Carolyn Wolfberg either individually or combined instituted four separate lawsuits and filed one counterclaim against the Plaintiff Robert I. Greenberg or against a party with which Mr. Greenberg was in privity, may the four separate suits and the counterclaim be considered as a single suit…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Pierce v. GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Michaels v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.