Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2001No. S083466PublishedCited by 422 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

On July 1, 1993, Gian Luigi Ferri killed eight people and wounded six—and then killed himself—during a shooting rampage at 101 California Street, a high-rise office building in San Francisco. Survivors and representatives of some of Ferri’s victims (plaintiffs) sued defendant Nave-gar, Inc. (Navegar), which made two of the three weapons Ferri used.

We granted review to determine whether plaintiffs may hold Navegar liable on a common law negligence theory. We hold they may not, because the Legislature has declared as a matter of public policy that a gun manufacturer may not be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by422 opinions

  1. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

417 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API