Legal Opinion

Harrington v. City of Battle Creek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1939No. Docket No. 114, Calendar No. 40,330PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This snit was brought by plaintiff, a married woman, to recover damages on account of injuries she claims to have received the evening of December 17, 1936, while walking on the cement sidewalk along State street in the city of Battlé Creek, when her left foot stepped into a shallow hole in the walk and her toe caught beneath the protruding edge and caused her to fall upon an iron grating.

Trial was had by jury, with verdict for plaintiff.

At the close of plaintiff’s proofs, defendant moved for a directed verdict. This was denied, as was a like motion at the close of all the proofs. However,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Olcott v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Cornell v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Dooling v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Moulthrop v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Waco v. LandinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Penix v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Treitz v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Rottschafer v. City of East Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API