Legal Opinion

Penix v. City of St. Johns

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1958No. Docket 5, Calendar 47,474PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Defendant city appeals, on leave granted, from denial of its motion to dismiss. The *260motion was based on-2 grounds: (1) that as appears from the allegations of plaintiff’s declaration timely notice of her claim was not presented to the city commission, as required by the city charter, and (2) that her declaration alleges damages resulting from the negligence of defendant’s employees in performance of a governmental function. Pertinent provisions of the declaration follow:

“2. "That the defendant, the city of St. Johns, is a municipal corporation located in Clinton county, Michigan, whose'…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. BlackebyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Daniels v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Gunther v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Royston v. City of CharlotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. McCann v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Meredith v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API