Legal Opinion
Treitz v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 12, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack
Affirming.
This is our first case involving an interpretation of Chapter 123 of the Acts of 1940, KRS 411.110. The Act follows:
“Section 1. That no action shall be maintained against any city in the State of Kentucky on account of any injury growing out of any defect in the condition of any bridge, boulevard, street, sidewalk, alley or other public thoroughfare in the said cities unless notice,shall have been given the Mayor or City Clerk, or Clerk of the Board of Aldermen of said cities in the same manner as is provided for the service of notice in actions…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ponsrok v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Pender v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Harrington v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Reid v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Galloway v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- City of Louisville v. VerstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Stone v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Reibel v. WoolworthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Ballinger v. City of HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.