Legal Opinion

Cornell v. City of Ypsilanti

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 95PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Sample (George W.), J. Case by Emilie C. Cornell against the city of Ypsilanti for personal injuries caused by a defective sidewalk. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff recovered a substantial judgment against defendant for injuries received by her through the claimed negligence of the city in not main-*542taming its sidewalk on Cross street in a reasonably safe condition for public' travel. Cross street is a much-traveled thoroughfare in Ypsilanti. The sidewalk was of cement. Plaintiff, a resident of Ann Arbor, had with her husband spent the day with her sister, Mrs. Knisely, at Ypsilanti. About dusk Mr.- and Mrs. Cornell, accompanied by Mr. and Mrs. Knisely, started to take the interurban car for Ann Arbor. The distance was a short one and they were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Beltz v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Hamilton v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Butler v. . Village of OxfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Terry v. . Village of PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Weisse v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Harrington v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Howard v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Rottschafer v. City of East Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. City of Tulsa v. WheetleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API