Grubaugh v. City of St. Johns
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Kavanagh, J.
The primary issue raised below and saved for appeal in this cause is whether the 60-day notice requirement of § 8 of chapter 22 of the general highway statute 1 is constitutionally infirm when applied to a plaintiff rendered mentally or physically incapacitated by the alleged tortious act of a state or municipal defendant giving rise to the asserted cause of action. This issue has been alluded to previously by this Court but never presented squarely for decision. (See Boike v. City of Flint [1965], 374 Mich 462, 464; Trbovich v. City of Detroit [1966], 378 Mich 79, 88, 99.)
On March 14, 1961,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Meredith v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Minty v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Joslyn v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Whitlow v. Bd. of Educ. of Kanawha Cty.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- McCAHAN v. BRENNANMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.