Legal Opinion

Dooling v. City of Malden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIttrGG, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of a defect in the highway. G. L. c. 84, § 18. There was testimony tending to show that the plaintiff on the day in question was injured on a sidewalk in the defendant city because of slipping on a thin coating of ice covering a stone, which extended into the sidewalk from two to three feet and to a height of two or three inches.

Within ten days after the injury, notice in writing was given to the mayor of the defendant by a brother-in-law of the plaintiff setting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Naze v. Inhabitants of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Gardner v. Inhabitants of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Townsend v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Town of WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. City of Waco v. LandinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Crowell v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Delano v. Garrettson-Ellis Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Harrington v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API