Legal Opinion

Jones v. TOWN OF REDDING

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 25, 2010No. SC 18445PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation commission (commission) has continuing jurisdiction under General Statutes § 31-315 1 to open and modify an approved voluntary agreement (agreement) for benefits that was premised on a subject matter jurisdictional mistake of law. The named defendant, the town of Redding (defen dant), 2 appeals 3 from the decision of the compensation review board (board), reversing the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the seventh district (commissioner), that had, in accordance with the defendant’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Demond v. Project Service, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. GAMEZ-REYES v. BiagiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Carter v. Town of ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API