Legal Opinion
In Re Jorden R.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 6, 2009No. SC 18169PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The primary issue in this case is whether, in termination proceedings under General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 17a-112 (j), 1 a trial court can find that a parent is unwilling or unable to benefit from reunification services without first finding that reasonable efforts were made to reunify the parent with her child. The petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s judgment terminating the respondent mother’s parental rights with respect to her infant son, Jorden R. In re…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Lyon v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Western Dermatology Consultants, P.C. v. VitalWorks, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- In Re Matthew F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In Re Tayler F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Town of Middlebury v. Conn. Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Green v. YANKEE GAS CORP.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.